SOCIAL DARWINISM AND THE DARK CLAN
Darwinism claims that life is a coincidental
product of evolutionary processes. As an ideology it suggests
that conflict, bloodshed, aggression and the suppression of
the weak is the law of nature. With this perverse logic, Darwinism
has caused many tragedies in history.
It has been established that the dark
clan's system is antireligious and aims to eliminate religious morality
from society. Particular targets are the monotheistic religions like
Islam, Judaism, and Christianity, even though Christianity and Judaism
have been tampered with since the time of their original revelations.
Religions like Buddhism, Hinduism and karma-based atheist and pagan
religions on the other hand, are not opposed by the clan. On the contrary,
their proliferation is encouraged due to their lack of spiritual authenticity,
having more in common with philosophy than genuine religion.
These far eastern religions (also New Age and UFO cults etc.) are
insufficient as an underpinning for the entirety of the clan's world-view.
A more comprehensive system is required as the basis for the way of
life they wish to promote. In reality most members of the clan are
indifferent to philosophical topics such as these, in fact, they are
ignorant in many respects and simply pursue a life that revolves around
money, sex and entertainment. However, the theorists of the clan are
fully aware of the importance of providing a world-view that accommodates
the activities of its more ignorant members as well as its more far-reaching
purposes. Darwinism and its off-shoot, social Darwinism, form the
basis for this world-view. Social Darwinism is the theory of evolution
applied to the social sciences. The fact that there is no scientific
value in Darwinism has been extensively examined in our other books.
Here are some of this theory's unfounded claims:
1- Life on earth is the result of a totally accidental evolutionary
process and therefore has no purpose.
2- The only true rule in life is "the survival of the fittest". The
only way to succeed in the struggle for survival is to be selfish
3- Man too is an animal species and he is subject to the same biological
constraints. In other words, the law of the jungle applies to man
as well as beast.
Despite the fact that no supporting evidence ever emerged after Darwin
made his deranged claims, they nevertheless gained widespread acceptance,
the reason being that the prevalent anti-religious sentiment of that
time had found an ideological basis in Darwin's theory. Imperialist
Britain needed a justification for her colonial activities and found
this in Darwinist terminology such as "the struggle for survival in
the international arena" and "more advanced races on the ladder of
For this reason, the ruling classes in Britain and then the other
great states accepted Darwinism. War, therefore, was seen as a biological
necessity by the European rulers of the time and this played a significant
role in the outbreak of the First World War.
Even worse consequences of social Darwinism appeared in the twentieth
century: Nazi Germany and fascism. The Nazis, considering man to be
an advanced species of animal did not mind rising to power by trampling
on the weak, they did not hesitate to eliminate the sick or weak by
whatever means necessary, and they did not refrain from murdering
and destroying races considered different or inferior. This was possible
because they believed in a theory disguised in a scientific veneer
which persuaded them that they were acting according to the laws of
… Each time they kindle the fire of war,
God extinguishes it. They rush about the earth corrupting it.
God does not love corrupters. (Qur'an, 5: 64)
Do not corrupt the earth after it has been put right. Call on
Him fearfully and eagerly. God's mercy is close to the good-doers.
(Qur'an, 7: 56)
A more widespread consequence of social Darwinism has manifested
itself in the form of the moral degeneration which affects most modern
societies. The Darwinist social structure, founded on the basis of
competition and pitilessness produces a world-view with no regard
for morality and hence, communities that consider themselves and the
rest of mankind to be a species of advanced animal. Darwinist ideology
regards individual self-interest as the only thing that matters; it
regards self-sacrifice to be appropriate only where it is in the interest
of the individual to do so, and that to do otherwise is against human
nature. This misleading ideology has given rise to a culture where
every kind of selfishness and aggression is deemed justifiable.
To the famous Darwinist Richard Dawkins,
humans are machines ruled by selfish genes. This perverse claim
forms the basic principle of the social system advocated by
the dark clan
The propagators of this culture make frequent references to Darwinism.
That to be selfish and ruthless is proper is an argument almost always
based on Darwinism. One of the most fervent and famous Darwinists
is the English zoologist and author Richard Dawkins, an atheist whose
books are an example of this viewpoint. He has become the best-known
defender of the theory of evolution. He claims that selfish genes
rule all life on earth and that egotism is the primary principle of
natural law. In his Selfish Gene, Dawkins expresses his irrational
The argument of this book is that we, and all other
animals, are machines created by our genes. Like successful Chicago
gangsters our genes have survived, in some cases for millions of years
in a highly competitive world. This entitles us to expect certain
qualities in our genes. I shall argue that a predominant quality to
be expected in a successful gene is ruthless selfishness.13
It is not hard to imagine what kind of societal model will be produced
by a philosophy that believes man to be a merciless, selfish machine,
comparable to Chicago gangsters. In reality, Dawkins and other Darwinists
are preparing the ground for social conflict and legalised crime by
means of various media, sending out messages disguised as scientific
truths in order to impose this world-view upon the masses. When Dawkins
says that we are survival machines; robots programmed to protect our
selfish genes, he justifies every kind of rape and violence. Phillip
Johnson, one of the foremost opponents of Darwinism, says:
The logic implies that it may be only natural for
robot vehicles to murder, rape or enslave other robots to satisfy
their genetic masters.14
The reality of this matter is that the logic advocated by Dawkins
and the other Darwinists is no different to the unholy beliefs of
primitive pagan clans. Primitive pagans worshipped idols and totems
they had made with their own hands in the belief that man owed their
existence to them, and fought wars and shed blood to please these
"gods". The modern Darwinist - or the theorists of the dark clan -
believe that genes, themselves a product of a series of coincidences
for which one must fight, are responsible for man's creation. In short,
the age-old pagan folly, ignorance and violence lives on; from the
totemic clans of thousands of years ago to today's Darwinist dark
In reality, God has created man from nothing and requires from him
not to be selfish and violent. On the contrary, God taught man through
His religion to be ethical, generous, compassionate, and peaceful.
The creator and ruler of humankind is neither an idol, nor a totem
nor an unaware mass of matter such as the genes. The Lord of the universe,
God Who determines the fate and controls every moment of man's life,
has created humankind. However, the clan ignores this fact or rejects
The comprehensive brainwashing and indoctrination campaign fought on
behalf of the theory of evolution is presided over by the clan and its
ideological partner: Darwinism. The theorists of the dark clan are well
aware that the irreligious and selfish world they have created is "scientifically"
based on Darwinism and for this reason, they use any means of propaganda
to keep this defective theory alive.
THE DEFINITION OF GENETIC GUILT IN SOCIAL DARWINISM
The theorists of the dark clan use Darwinism
in a number of different ways according to which crime they wish to
justify. Since man is an animal in their view, he has a genetic make-up
inherited from the animal world and as such, there are natural reasons
for crimes like murder, rape, theft etc. which relate to the struggle
for survival. According to this, if humankind is not killing one another,
stealing from each other and damaging the environment, it cannot be
claimed that they are restrained from such acts by their conscience,
but because they are protecting the interests of their species. It
is not out of the ordinary for them to murder, rape and carry out
massacres, because it is in man's "nature". It follows from this outlandish
theory that when man, an animal species, does show his animal side
by committing these acts of violence, he cannot be blamed.
Cesare Lombroso, acknowledged to be the
founder of criminal anthropology, claims that criminals are
people who are behind in the evolutionary process and that it
is therefore natural for them to commit crimes. This unscientific
claim by Lombroso, with some modifications, is still being defended
by some evolutionists.
God, on the other hand, reveals that He has created humankind in
such a way that they will find peace and contentment only when they
act conscientiously. Man's inherent nature derives pleasure from love,
compassion, modesty, generosity and friendship - in other words, from
living by the values of religion. Our Lord reveals this truth in the
So set your face firmly towards the Religion,
as a pure natural believer, God's natural pattern on which He made mankind…
(Qur'an, 30: 30)
Another aspect of the irrational logic of Darwinism
reveals itself in its rationale as to what actually constitutes crime.
One of the first advocates of the view that crime is genetic and one
of the founders of criminal anthropology, was evolutionist Cesare
Lombroso (1835-1909). His views, which were later taken up and defended
by many other evolutionary scientists as a justification for crime,
accelerated the process of social degeneration (Some evolutionists
claim that Lombroso's views were never widely accepted but it is a
fact that in today's scientific community, terms coined by Lombroso
such as "guilty genes" and "guilty chromosomes" are commonly used
and his views, slightly modified, are still in circulation. Some Darwinists
openly admit this.15).
According to Lombroso's totally unscientific claim, people who had
committed crimes had in reality not done so, because they had only
acted according to their nature as people who had been left behind
in the evolutionary race. Therefore, it was only natural for them
to commit crimes and this factor should be taken into consideration
in the process of prosecution and sentencing. How Lombroso came up
with this theory of "guilt by birth" is truly worth noting for its
lack of scientific credentials:
Suddenly, the morning of a gloomy day in December,
I found in the skull of a brigand a very long series of atavistic
anomalies… The problem of the nature and of the origin of the criminal
seemed to me resolved; the characters of primitive men and of inferior
animals must be reproduced in our times.16
Lombroso and his assistants also claimed that longer arms, a narrow
and setback forehead, big ears, a thick skull and a big protruding
chin are the basic physical characteristics of the born criminal.
They further claimed that tattoos originated in and belonged to tribal
Africa, and therefore that people who have tattoos are some sort of
human primate, and that therefore it should be perceived as normal
that they are more inclined to commit crimes. Thus, it became justifiable
for people with tattoos to commit crimes.
This crude method of determining guilt by examining skulls, measuring
the length of arms, and searching the bodies for tattoos was an error
of the era's primitive scientific standards and was abandoned as times
moved on. Yet even today, evolutionary scientists are continuing to
defend similar theories albeit they are presented in a more "scientific"
fashion. According to them crime is not the result of a deviation from
the natural self but an act of the so-called evolutionary nature of
ne of the Darwinists whose comments stand
out in this respect is Steven Pinker. He is best known for his books on
human consciousness, or to be more precise, books which try to explain
the mind on the basis of Darwinist materialist dogma but fail to do so.
He owes his fame to the baby murders committed in 1996 and 1997.
In the first of these, an American couple both 18 and high school
students strangled their illegitimate baby and threw the corpse into
a large rubbish bin. In the second case an 18 year-old American girl
left half way through her prom and gave birth in the toilets. She
then killed the baby, threw the body into the bin, and returned to
These two shocking cases demonstrated to Americans the extent of
violence, cruelty, and mercilessness prevailing in their society.
People were shocked and these cases were widely discussed. Most people
argued that these incomprehensible murders were the result of moral
degeneration and the psychological instability of the perpetrators.
However, one of the best known and most ardent American Darwinists,
Steven Pinker, interpreted these cases very differently. Pinker argued
that these cases were not the consequence of moral degeneration or
psychopathological problems but were rather ordinary acts compatible
with the evolutionary nature of humankind. In an article published
in the New York Times, he argued that these cases which he termed
"neonaticide" (the murder of a day old baby) should not be considered
as showing mental illness because killing newborn babies was accepted
and practised by many cultures in history. Pinker went even further
in his perverse assertion by claiming that this kind of killing was
an evolutionary necessity:
To the Darwinist Steven Pinker it is only
natural for some mothers to kill their babies. The evolutionist
mentality does not refrain from defending such cruelty.
Mammals are extreme among animals in the amount
of time, energy and food they invest in their young, and humans are
extreme among mammals. Parental investment is a limited resource,
and mammalian mothers must "decide" whether to allot it to their newborn
or to their current and future offspring. If a newborn is sickly,
or if its survival is not promising, they may cut their losses and
favor the healthiest in the litter or try again later on.17
According to Pinker, this neonaticide is part of our genetic makeup
and can resurface where the mother considers it risky to give birth.
In other words, these American high school girls who had carried their
babies in their bellies and then cruelly murdered their own children,
according to Pinker had displayed "genetic behaviour" in keeping with
the rules of evolution.
In brief, Pinker regarded these baby murders as
natural from a Darwinist point of view. Michael Kelly wrote in the
Washington Post an article entitled "Arguing for Infanticide" in which
he said, "Steven Pinker . . . did not go quite so far as to openly
recommend the murder of infants… But close enough, close enough."18
One part of Pinker's unscientific argument, which was nothing more
than Darwinist speculation, was especially interesting, namely, that
in primitive societies infanticide was practised too. Yes, there were
many pagan nations which practised infanticide, but the reason for
this was not as Pinker claimed an evolutionary tendency, but their
deranged morality. Pagans were sacrificing children to their imaginary
gods or would simply kill "useless" children without mercy.
With the spread of theistic religions, this degenerate morality disappeared
completely. Tenderness, compassion and love replaced infanticide.
Pre-Islamic Arab society is an example of this. The Islamic religion
forbids this horrific practice categorically. God, in the Qur'an,
ordered the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) to proclaim that
infanticide was prohibited:
Say: "Come and I will recite to you what your
Lord has made forbidden for you": that you do not associate anything
with Him; that you are good to your parents; that you do not kill your
children because of poverty - We will provide for you and them; that
you do not approach indecency - outward or inward; that you do not kill
any person God has made inviolate - except with the right to do so.
That is what He instructs you to do so that hopefully you will use your
intellect. (Qur'an, 6: 151)
In another verse of the Qur'an, God speaks of the irrationality and
sin of infanticide:
According to the perverse philosophy of
Darwinism, murderers, thieves and rapists have not completed
their evolution. This perverse mentality aims to create tolerance
for all crimes.
Those who kill their children foolishly without
any knowledge and make what God has provided for them forbidden, inventing
lies against God, such people are lost. They are misguided. They are not
guided… (Qur'an, 6: 140)
In yet another verse of the Qur'an, God ordered Muhammad (peace be
upon him) to take an oath from women who came to ally themselves to
him, not to "kill their children," besides the other oath of
faith and morality (Qur'an, 60: 12). To God, infanticide is an intolerable
perversion, cruelty and ignorance.
The point to be noted here is that modern Darwinism attempts to portray
the moral deviations of pagan societies as evolutionary tendencies,
and thus make them justifiable and acceptable.
The Islamic as well as Christian and Jewish laws forbid the infanticide
of pagan societies and those practices have become buried in history.
As people become distanced from religious values, those pagan perversions
are resurfacing and the Darwinists are trying to justify this with
As can be seen, the Darwinist social model is identical to the dark
clan's vision of society. By defending and upholding Darwinism, the
dark clan actually safeguards its own habitat and secures its continuity.
For this reason, the bond between the dark clan and Darwinism is a solid
THEFT, RAPE AND HOMOSEXUALITY
Research reveals the extent of the damage
done to society by the Darwinist philosophy, which regards even
rape as natural. Research conducted in England reveals that
50% of youth consider rape as normal. This serious situation
is one of the consequences of society's abandonment of religious
Pinker's arguments in relation to the
baby murders are only one of the pro-crime tendencies of Darwinism.
They argue for many other acts which are acknowledged by conventional
wisdom as crimes, to be perceived as normal. The evolutionists' illogical
argument holds that anyone committing a crime like murder, theft or
rape etc. is in reality not guilty of the crime because he lags behind
in the process of evolution, and that this circumstance must be taken
into account when sentencing. At the bottom of this unscientific argument
lies the error that we carry genes derived from primates and that
these will cause us to display animal behaviour. The famous evolutionist
of the recent past, Stephen Jay Gould summarises this logic common
to many evolutionists:
Darwinists suggest that homosexuality
is genetic and produces many unfounded theories in order to
create tolerance for this perversion.
We may be clothed, citified, and civilised, but
we carry deep within us the genetic patterns of behaviour that served
our ancestor, the "killer ape."19
Some evolutionists go as far as to suggest that even rape should
be considered normal. In the recently published Natural History of
Rape the evolutionary scientists Randy Thornhill and Craig Palmer
argue that rape committed by man, who is still equipped with animal
instincts, should be considered normal. According to this perverse
claim it is normal behaviour for man as a species of animal, to occasionally
commit rape like his primate ancestors did and that this act may even
be essential for the continuation of the species:
We fervently believe that, just as the leopard's
spots and the giraffe's elongated neck are the results of aeons of past
Darwinian selection, so is rape… There is no doubt that rape has evolutionary
- and hence genetic - origins.20
As seen, Darwin's scientifically unsupported claim that man and ape
have a common ancestor, can lead man into a degenerate morality in
which even a violent act like rape becomes acceptable for mankind.
The perversion of homosexuality, a common practice in the dark clan,
presents a similar situation. In the Qur'an, God reveals that the
people of the Prophet Lut practised this perversion and forbids it
strictly. Today, those who portray this perversion as normal and try
to spread it, rely again on Darwinism for this purpose. The claim
that homosexuality is genetic is an attempt to present this perversion
as a normal, innocent practice and constitutes yet another unfounded
The real issue here must be the correct understanding of the term
ethics. Contrary to the evolutionists claim, God created man and taught
humankind right from wrong via His messengers and books of revelation.
Ethics is based on God's rules revealed in these books. At the same
time, God has given man a conscience which shows him righteousness
and an opposite instinct (ego) that leads him to evil. Therefore,
whatever the social context, level of education, language, race or
sex, every human knows right from wrong. If he is a God-fearing person,
he will listen to the voice of conscience and do good, but even if
the opposite is the case, he will still know deep down the wrong when
it is committed. Thus, if a person does wrong, it means that he knows
it to be so and is prepared to live with the consequences. God says:
Homosexuality is a deviation from man's natural self and
as such is clearly forbidden by religion. It must not be forgotten
that Satan orders people to "change God's creation". (4: 119)
He will try to lead man away from his nature and into perversion,
one of the most extreme examples of which is homosexuality.
God reveals in the Quran that Lut's people practised this
form of perversion. Despite Lut's invitation to follow the
righteous path, they persisted in perversion and denial and
became subject to God's punishment. The verses say :
And Lut, when he said to his
people, "Do you commit an obscenity not perpetrated before
you by anyone in all the worlds? You come with lust to men
instead of women. You are indeed a depraved people." The only
answer of his people was to say, "Expel them from your city!
They are people who keep themselves pure!" So We rescued him
and his family - except for his wife. She was one of those
who stayed behind. We rained down a rain upon them. See the
final fate of the evildoers!
(Qur'an, 7: 80-84)
By the soul and the One Who proportioned and
inspired it with knowledge of depravity and with its sense of duty,
he who purifies it has succeeded, he who covers it up has failed… (Qur'an,
DARWINISM: A NECESSITY FOR THE DARK CLAN
Does not man recall that We created him
before when he was not anything?
So far we have examined examples of Social Darwinism's views on morality
and crime. Claiming to be scientific with no scientific basis whatsoever,
the damaging effect of this ideology on the fabric of society is clear.
To consider robbery, theft, murder, rape and fornication as historically
natural realities and indeed, as biological necessities, will bring
quick social degeneration and waves of corruption, a fact which has
already occurred. Some groups benefiting from this immorality have found
a so-called scientific cover for it and are therefore clinging onto
it. Right at the top of this group is the dark clan. All the conditions
needed by the clan to serve its interests and survival are met by the
Darwinist social structure. For this reason safeguarding Darwinism and
working to preserve its corrupt ideology is, indirectly, a fundamental
ideological necessity for the clan's continued existence.
The theorists of the clan know very well that if Darwinism disappears,
people will begin to find true answers to the question of how they
came to be and what the real purpose of their life is. The first thing
someone will want to learn when he comes to realise that the universe
and its living beings are too perfect to be the product of blind chance,
as the baseless claims of Darwinism suggest, is how, by whom and in
what way this wonderful world was made. His investigations and research
will lead him to one answer: the universe and all the life it contains
are the work of a superior and exalted Creator Who is the Lord and
Ruler of all, the Almighty God.
The next thing someone who has realised this clear truth will do
is to get to know and appreciate our Creator properly. A human being
who lives his life as God prescribes will distance himself resolutely
from all kinds of immorality, he will be fair, he will not cheat nor
defraud, he will protect the vulnerable and stay clear of any acts
of injustice. In short, he will lead a life contrary to the dark clan's
preferred model. Growing numbers of people like this will bring about
the end of the clan.
This is why the dark clan's members worldwide do not want the Darwinist
sham to be exposed as such, together with its disinformation, imperfections,
contradictions and irrational and illogical claims. Fuelled by anger
and hatred, they are the most determined enemies of people who promote
the values of religion and who oppose Darwinism and materialism ideologically.
To understand the clan's actions it is necessary to examine first
its structure and then the methods it uses.