The Discovery Channel is persistently airing programs which spread propaganda
on the theory of evolution, presenting this theory to the public cloaked
as if it were scientific fact, even though in truth it is utterly lacking
Nearly 150 years ago, Charles Darwin, living in a scientifically backward
age, first presented his theory of evolution, but by our day its façade
of validity has disintegrated like so much dust. Since his time, research
and experiments based on scientific and technological advances have definitively
shown that there is no scientific evidence to back up the theory. The
dogged attachment of certain groups to this theory show that they are
worried about their crumbling philosophies. For in the case of the materialists,
recognizing the failure of this theory would mean having to give up their
entire worldview, and so they continue to blindly support evolution despite
all its demonstrable failures.
The continued airings of programs on the theory of evolution on the Discovery
Channel prove nothing but the senseless refusal of some quarters to accept
that this theory has come apart at the seams. The real reason for these
cranked-out programs pushing evolution is the great anxiety caused by
the theory's collapse. The Discovery Channel and similar evolutionist
TV channels - like the National Geographic or PBS - strongly resist recognizing
the shortcomings and contradictions of the theory. By continuing to air
such programs, they think that they can also hoodwink the public into
ignoring the truth.
However, they should know that the public can sense their fear. Ordinary
people are becoming more and more interested in the scientific evidence
against the theory of evolution. They understand that efforts to continue
spreading evolutionist propaganda in order to bring this floundering theory
back to life are mere exercises in futility.
Today People Know More About the Theory of Evolution
People know very well the essence of the theory of evolution, which is
based entirely upon wishful thinking and unwarranted assumptions. The
propaganda methods employed ever since the era in which Darwin produced
this theory seem old and outdated today, much like the theory itself.
Mass communication technology has made refutations of evolution accessible
to everyone, sounding the death knell of a dogmatic secular priesthood
that before had taken advantage of people's ignorance of such matters.
A couple of decades ago, many people believed adages such as "only
scientists are qualified to pass judgment on these things," "whatever
scientists say is true," and "it's useless for ordinary people
to think about these subjects, they wouldn't understand anyway."
In the past, evolutionists easily spread their mass indoctrination by
successfully deterring people from research and independent thinking.
But today, people can easily find the facts they need through the Internet
and various other means. The facts about the fallacies of evolutionary
theory have become more accessible, thus stripping evolutionist propaganda
of its veneer of validity.
As an example of this, a recent documentary about Africa has the narrator
saying, "This place is where our ancestors lived," yet fails
to produce any evidence to back up this assertion, and then shows a magnificent
design found in nature but immediately misrepresents it as "a wonderful
product of evolution." The forcible working in of such just-so stories
is a good example of evolutionary propaganda. In such programs, even technological
advances are absurdly presented as "the product of evolution."
These programs on biology, space exploration, the human body, geology,
sociology and other fields all come around to promoting evolution through
assertions utterly lacking in scientific value. Still, all these efforts
cannot save the evolutionists from the dilemma they've put themselves
in. By making such groundless assertions, evolutionists may manage to
keep deceiving themselves, but they cannot escape the fact that their
theory is both unscientific and irrational.
People are quite aware that evolutionists have a limited store of bogus
evidence up their sleeves with which to defend themselves. And they also
know that this meager hoard of fake evidence has long since been proved
invalid by scientific research and study.
Even as they persist with their efforts to spread propaganda, evolutionists
should realize that people know about evolution and what they are up to.
People's awareness of this subject is growing all over the world. The
efforts of evolutionists have been rendered impotent by a number of valuable
projects pursued in recent years. At one point or another, most people
have been exposed to various books or other media discussing creation
and exposing the theory of evolution as nothing more than a hoax. These
books, magazines, documentaries and audiotapes laying out the case for
creation have reached far and wide, to cities and towns throughout the
world. A huge cross-section of the population - including middle and high
school students, university graduates and working people who attended
gatherings on the subject - have had the chance to see for themselves
that the theory of evolution is nothing but a fraud. Those who imagine
that people could be deceived by such hollow lies are gravely mistaken.
Those who work to spread the Darwinist propaganda must face countless
embarrassing questions that cry out for answers. For the general public
has become well informed, and so has begun questioning and doubting this
unscientific theory for themselves. Below are just a few of the pressing
questions which need answering:
- Just how did thousands of different proteins come into existence when
even the random formation of a single solitary protein is clearly mathematically
- If in the distant past a cell was formed through chance under the most
primitive conditions, why can't we manage to create a cell in today's
high-tech, modern laboratories?
- How were the complex systems in cells formed?
- The fossil record shows that some species underwent no change at all
for millions of years. How did these species survive down to our day without
- Where can we find the transitional fossils showing the transformation
of one species into another? How did so many different classes of animals
suddenly emerge in the Cambrian age without any documented ancestors in
the fossil record?
- How does the mechanism of natural selection explain the irreducibly
complex designs of living things?
- How can you possibly account for intentional acts of self-sacrifice
seen across the animal kingdom?
- How did lifeless, unconscious atoms somehow gather together to form
- How did unconscious atoms come to form humans with the ability to think,
feel, experience pleasure, work, create and make discoveries?
These and many other similar questions have yet to be satisfactorily
answered despite 150 years of research and experimentation into evolution
and ample opportunity to do so. If the evolutionists are sincere in their
beliefs, then by all means they should supply clear answers to each of
these questions, one by one, without resorting to any tricks. If they
feel it necessary, they should bring their most reputable scientists onto
television shows to face the cameras and answer this multitude of questions.
These proponents of evolution should review books that clearly challenge
their theory and address the explanations contained therein, point by
point, in order to disprove them. But they are doomed to failure, for
evolutionist dogma can never withstand these clear refutations of evolution.
For instance, these evolutionists constantly speak of a somewhat miraculous
force of "nature" that supposedly triggered the process of evolution,
but they are unable to explain its main mechanisms and just how this process
took place. Instead they try to mislead people through just-so stories,
mainly based on scenarios of organs or traits appearing due to the needs
of plants and animals. For example, an "explanation" on the
origin of flight such as, "Terrestrial reptiles, while chasing flies,
tended to develop proto-wings" is a totally unscientific scenario.
For the "need" for a wing does not create it. Mutations do not
occur to answer the needs of organisms. And when they occur, they do not
add any new genetic information to the genome - so they don't result in
Another misleading rhetorical trick used to explain the origin of species
is to speak as if the animals themselves were responsible for their supposed
"evolution". You might hear sentences like "birds acquired
wings" or "fish developed fins." Of course, the evolutionists
are aware that animals can't design or develop their bodies, but in order
to avoid terms such as "design" or "creation," they
prefer to invoke self-design or self-creation, which are both ridiculous
Invoking "chance" is another ridiculous idea, in face of the
amazing and irreducible designs in living things which are clearly designed
for a purpose. "Chance" is in fact the worst answer, because
it is refuted by mathematical calculations alone.
Evolutionists keep on parroting the same tired, discredited attempts
at explanation, and trying to brainwash the public into believing them,
and imagining that they can transform fantastic fabrications into facts.
But telling the same fairy tale over and over again ad nauseam doesn't
change the fact that it's a fairy tale, with no relation to reality. A
fairy tale stays a fairy tale no matter what you do. If you tell someone
the same lie every day, day in and day out, it will never become the truth.
If you say, "The sun doesn't rise in the morning" every day,
and even if you kept on repeating this phrase for years and years and
decades on end, the sun would still rise every morning, and everyone would
If they are truly sincere in their mistaken convictions, the Discovery
Channel and other evolutionist TV channels should respond to this message
and do so using scientific methods. They must account for the inconsistencies
of this theory, the ones which even secondary school students can see
through, and they should publicly defend their views on a scientific platform.
Otherwise they must accept the truth that the theory of evolution is losing
ground with each new scientific discovery and that the inevitable paradigm
shift in science will soon result in the acceptance of Intelligent Design,