The completion of human's gene map today does not yield the result
that man and ape are relatives. One need not be deceived by evolutionists'
attempts to exploit this new scientific development just as they do with
As known, the recent completion of the human gene map within the scope
of the Human Genome Project has been a very important scientific
improvement. However, some results of this project are being distorted
in some evolutionist publications. It is claimed that the genes of
chimpanzees have a similarity to human genes by 98 % and this is promoted
as an evidence to the claim that apes are close to humans, and therefore,
to the theory of evolution. In truth, this is a "fake" evidence
put forward by evolutionists who benefit from the lack of knowledge of
society about this subject.
98 % Similarity Claim is a Misleading Propaganda
First, it should be stated that the 98% similarity concept, frequently
advanced by evolutionists about the DNAs of man and chimpanzee, is
In order to claim that the genetic make-ups of man and chimpanzee bear
98 % similarity, the genome of the chimpanzee also has to be mapped just
as that of man's, the two has to be compared, and the result of this comparison
has to be obtained. However no such result is available, because so far,
only the gene of mankind has been mapped. No such research is yet done
for the chimpanzee.
In reality, the 98 % similarity between the genes of man and ape, which
now and then becomes an agenda item, is a propaganda oriented slogan deliberately
invented years ago. This similarity is an extraordinarily exaggerated
generalization grounded on the similarity in the amino acid sequences
of some 30-40 basic proteins present in man and chimpanzee. A sequence
analysis has been made with a method named "DNA hybridization"
on the DNA sequences that are correlated with these proteins and only
those limited number of proteins have been compared.
However there are about hundred thousand genes, and therefore 100 thousand
proteins coded by these genes in humans. For that reason, there is no
scientific basis for claiming that all the genes of man and ape are
98% similar only because of the similarity in 40 out of 100.000 proteins.
On the other hand, the DNA comparison carried out on those 40 proteins
is also controversial. This comparison was made in 1987 by two biologists
named Sibley and Ahlquist and published in the periodical named Journal
of Molecular Evolution. (v.26 pp. 99-1212) However another scientist
named Sarich who examined the data obtained by these two scientists concluded
that the reliability of the method they used is controversial and that
the data has been exaggeratedly interpreted. (Sarich et al, 1989,
Cladisticts 5:3-32) Dr. Don Batten, another biologist, also analyzed the
issue in 1996 and concluded that the real similarity rate is 96.2%, not
98 %.(CEN, 19(1); 21-22 December 1996-February 1997)
Human DNA is also similar to that of the worm, mosquito
Moreover, the above mentioned basic proteins are common vital molecules
present in various other living beings. The structure of the same kinds
of proteins present not only in chimpanzee, but also in completely different
living beings, is very similar to that in the humans.
For example, the genetic analyses published in New Scientist have
revealed a 75 % similarity between the DNAs of nematode worms and man.
(New Scientist, 15 May 1999, p.27) This definitely does not mean that
there is only a 25% difference between man and these worms! According
to the family tree made by evolutionists, the Chordata phylum, in which
man is included, and Nematoda phylum were different from each other even
530 million years ago.
On the other hand, in another finding which also appeared in the Turkish
media, it was stated that the comparisons carried out between the genes
of fruit fly belonging to the Drosophila species and human genes yielded
a similarity of 60%. (Hürriyet, 24 February 2000)
On the other hand, the analyses done on some proteins show man as close
to some very different living beings. In a survey carried out by the researchers
in Cambridge University, some proteins of land dwelling animals were compared.
Amazingly, in nearly all samples, man and chicken were paired as the
closest relatives. The next closest relative was crocodile. (New
Scientist v.103, 16 August 1984, p.19)
Another example used by evolutionists on "the genetic similarity
between man and ape", is the presence of 48 chromosomes in chimpanzees
and gorillas versus 46 chromosomes in man. Evolutionists regard the
closeness of the number of chromosomes as indication of an evolutionary
relationship. However, if this logic used by evolutionists were true,
then man should have an even closer relative than chimpanzee: "the
potato"!. Because the number of chromosomes in potatoes is the
same as that of man: 46
These examples certify that the concept of genetic similarity does not
constitute evidence for the theory of evolution. This is because the genetic
similarities are not in line with the alleged evolution schemes, and on
the contrary, they yield completely opposite results.
Similarities are not Evidence for Evolution but for
It is surely natural for the human body to bear some molecular similarities
to other living beings, because they all are made up of the same molecules,
they all use the same water and atmosphere, and they all consume foods
consisting of the same molecules. Certainly, their metabolisms and therefore
genetic make-ups would resemble to one another. This, however, is not
evidence that they evolved from a common ancestor.
This "common material" is not the result of an evolution
but of "common design", that is, their being created upon the
It is possible to explain this subject with an example; all constructions
in the world are done with similar materials (brick, iron, cement, etc.).
This, however, does not mean that these buildings "evolved"
from each other. They are constructed separately by using common materials.
The same is true for living beings as well.
Life did not originate as a result of unconscious coincidences as evolution
claims, but as the result of the creation of God, the Almighty, the owner
of infinite knowledge and wisdom.
DARWINIST-MATERIALIST MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT THE HUMAN
With the announcement of the latest point arrived in the Human Genome
Project, some publishing organs in Turkey started to deliver misleading
messages and misinform the public so that the impasse the theory of evolution
has reached is not further disclosed.
In earlier pages, we mentioned the misleading messages evolutionists
delivered about the "genetic similarities" and made clear that
these are the subjective interpretations which do not provide any evidence
for the theory of evolution. The subject which is mostly promoted and
highlighted with different slogans and headlines by the Darwinist-materialist
press is the claim that the discovery of the gene map suggests that the
fate decreed by God can be challenged. This is a great misconception and
deceit put forward by certain circles in our country. The headlines recently
appearing in the printed press and the course of discussions in television
programs give the impression of a stealthy indoctrination. It is a great
mistake to present the information on the human genome project accompanied
by messages like "Man will no longer be defeated by his destiny."
For in truth, the mapping of the human genes has no relevance whatsoever
to the flow of man's fate.
The Flow of Fate Cannot be Changed
Destiny is God's perfect knowledge of all events past or future as a
single moment. A majority of people question how God can already know
events that have not yet been experienced and this leads them to fail
in understanding the fact of destiny. However, "events not yet experienced"
are only so for us. God is not bound by time or space, for He Himself
has created them. For this reason, past, future, and present are all the
same to God; for Him everything has already taken place and finished.
This is true for everyone and every incident. For instance, God has created
everyone with a certain lifetime and everyone's moment of death is determined
as to its location, time and form in the sight of God. If, in the years
to come, the lifetime of a person is extended with timely interventions
in the genes, this would not mean that this event defeated that person's
destiny. This simply means the following: God gave this man a long life
and He made the completion of gene mapping a means for his life being
long. The discovery of gene map, that person's living in that era, that
person's life being extended by scientific means are all his destiny.
All is determined in the sight of God before this person is born into
Similarly, a person whose fatal sickness is cured through the discoveries
made within the scope of this project has again not changed his destiny.
That is because it is this person's destiny to recover from this illness
by means of this project. Consequently, completion of the human genome
and the fact that man will be able to intervene in the genetic makeup,
do not mean confronting the destiny created by God. On the contrary, this
way, humanity follows the developments created for them by God, explores
and benefits from the information created by God. If man lives 120 years
thanks to these scientific developments, this is surely a lifetime decreed
for him by God, this is why he lives so long.
In brief, expressions like "I defeated my destiny", "I
changed my destiny" or "I intervened in my destiny" are
consequences of ignorance caused by not knowing the fact of fate. On the
other hand, a person's using these expressions is also predestined; how,
when and under which conditions he will make these statements are all
determined in the sight of God.
Cloning a Human Being or any other Living being is
In some publications, it has been alleged that by the advancement of
the science of genetics, human beings would be cloned and therefore, human
beings would create human beings. This, too, is a very distorted and farfetched
logic. Creating is to bring something into being from nothingness, and
this act is peculiar to God alone. The formation of the identical of a
living being through the copying of genetic information does not mean
that this living being is created. While man or any other living being
is cloned, the cells of a living being are taken and copied. However,
never has a single living cell been created from nothingness. The researches
conducted on this subject have been stopped as they all were inconclusive.
Consequently, the discovery of the human's genetic makeup by no means
implies man's challenge to his destiny, and never can it be. Every incident,
every speech and development are all predetermined in the sight of God
according to a certain destiny. So are scientific developments and the
innovations they will introduce. God is All-Knowing, and All-Encompassing.
The fact that everything, big or small, takes places within the knowledge
of God is related in the Qur'an as follows:
You do not engage in any matter or recite any of the
Qur'an or do any action without Our witnessing you while you are occupied
with it. Not even the smallest speck eludes your Lord, either on earth
or in heaven. Nor is there anything smaller than that, or larger, which
is not in a Clear Book. (Surah Yunus: 61)